Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners

LGAPLEM608A Mapping and Delivery Guide
Identify and evaluate options to improve road safety

Version 1.0
Issue Date: May 2024


Qualification -
Unit of Competency LGAPLEM608A - Identify and evaluate options to improve road safety
Description This unit covers the identification of road safety risks, development of options and assessment of their effectivenessThis unit covers the identification of road safety risks, development of options and assessment of their effectivenes
Employability Skills Not applicable.
Learning Outcomes and Application Not applicable.
Duration and Setting X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting.
Prerequisites/co-requisites Not applicable.
Competency Field
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners Student Learning Resources Handouts
Activities
Slides
PPT
Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3 Assessment 4
Elements of Competency Performance Criteria              
Element: Identify road safety risks
  • Records and statistics are monitored, both day and night, to identify problems and areas of risk
  • Complaints, requests, comments and observations are analysed to identify problems or areas of risk
       
Element: Assess road safety risks
  • Risk sites are investigated to clearly establish conditions and causes of accidents and collisions
  • Research is undertaken to collect evidence regarding identified risks
  • Identified risks are compared and assessed against legislative requirements, codes of practice, relevant Australian standards and community expectations
  • Clear priorities based on a ranking of safety factors are established
       
Element: Develop and evaluate options
  • Options relevant to reducing risk are identified
  • Acquisition or resumption of land is identified
  • All options are assessed on the basis of cost effectiveness, efficiency and practicality
  • Preferred option to reduce risk is selected based on Council guidelines
       
Element: Present preferred options to Council
  • Council 'approval in principle' is obtained
  • Statutory and other relevant authority approvals are obtained in required timeframes with minimal modification to the preferred option
  • Opportunities are provided for community consultation to maximise acceptance of preferred option
  • Clear, concise documentation is prepared that provides full preliminary cost details
  • Options and recommendations, supported by clear rationale, are submitted to Council for endorsement
       
Element: Prepare detailed design
  • Initial brief and regular, clear communication with design personnel is undertaken
  • Implementation timeframes are advised to design personnel to ensure detail design is completed as required
  • Design development is monitored to completion to ensure no errors or omissions are made
  • A safety design audit is undertaken
  • Final detailed cost estimates are accurately prepared
       


Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

Critical aspects of evidence

production of accurate information

analysis of sites and information

data interpretation

survey development

presentation and endorsement of options

effective problem solving based on research

Interdependent assessment of units

Prerequisite units: nil

Co-requisite units: nil

Underpinning knowledge

national and state traffic management policy

traffic classification and statistics

traffic legislation

traffic standards and guidelines

traffic engineering practice

analytical methods

Council policy, structure and services

accident records

road safety

traffic laws

Underpinning skills

consultation and negotiation with a range of stakeholders

qualitative and quantitative research methodologies

traffic planning

policy interpretation

traffic engineering design and application

accident analysis

application of standards and guidelines

written and verbal reporting

forecasting trends

estimating resources

procurement procedures

cost control

safety auditing

Resource implications

access to workplace or simulated case study that provides the following resources:- computer data bases/relevant accident statistics;survey equipment, land and traffic survey; access to risk sites; access to relevant legislative requirements, council guidelines and Australian standards for road safety

Consistency in performance

evidence will need to be gathered over time across a range of variables

Context of assessment

on-the-job or in a simulated work environment

Critical aspects of evidence

production of accurate information

analysis of sites and information

data interpretation

survey development

presentation and endorsement of options

effective problem solving based on research

Interdependent assessment of units

Prerequisite units: nil

Co-requisite units: nil

Underpinning knowledge

national and state traffic management policy

traffic classification and statistics

traffic legislation

traffic standards and guidelines

traffic engineering practice

analytical methods

Council policy, structure and services

accident records

road safety

traffic laws

Underpinning skills

consultation and negotiation with a range of stakeholders

qualitative and quantitative research methodologies

traffic planning

policy interpretation

traffic engineering design and application

accident analysis

application of standards and guidelines

written and verbal reporting

forecasting trends

estimating resources

procurement procedures

cost control

safety auditing

Resource implications

access to workplace or simulated case study that provides the following resources:- computer data bases/relevant accident statistics;survey equipment, land and traffic survey; access to risk sites; access to relevant legislative requirements, council guidelines and Australian standards for road safety

Consistency in performance

evidence will need to be gathered over time across a range of variables

Context of assessment

on-the-job or in a simulated work environment


Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assignment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)


Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

Not applicable.

Application of this competency will vary according to the Council's size, location, organisational structure, resources, state/territory statutory requirements, business/strategic plans, and policies and practices

Accidents and collision causes

speed, volume, sight distance, vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, road and roadside environment, weather, transport mode

Environment contexts

metropolitan, urban, regional, rural, industrial, residential, commercial

Research types

surveys, observation, accident statistics, literature studies, applicable standards, questionnaires, gathering local knowledge

Affected parties

local occupants, neighbours, emergency services, public transport, through traffic

Funding options

Local Government, state government, federal government, private developers, schools, community groups, relevant authorities

Treatment

construction, diversion, speed zones, speed humps, traffic lights, roundabouts, education programs, public awareness campaigns, police liaison groups, multilingual information services

Council guidelines

risk assessment, cost benefit ratio, community expectations

Community

commercial, rate payers, land holders, residents, industrial, rural

Application of this competency will vary according to the Council's size, location, organisational structure, resources, state/territory statutory requirements, business/strategic plans, and policies and practices

Accidents and collision causes

speed, volume, sight distance, vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, road and roadside environment, weather, transport mode

Environment contexts

metropolitan, urban, regional, rural, industrial, residential, commercial

Research types

surveys, observation, accident statistics, literature studies, applicable standards, questionnaires, gathering local knowledge

Affected parties

local occupants, neighbours, emergency services, public transport, through traffic

Funding options

Local Government, state government, federal government, private developers, schools, community groups, relevant authorities

Treatment

construction, diversion, speed zones, speed humps, traffic lights, roundabouts, education programs, public awareness campaigns, police liaison groups, multilingual information services

Council guidelines

risk assessment, cost benefit ratio, community expectations

Community

commercial, rate payers, land holders, residents, industrial, rural

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Records and statistics are monitored, both day and night, to identify problems and areas of risk 
Complaints, requests, comments and observations are analysed to identify problems or areas of risk 
Risk sites are investigated to clearly establish conditions and causes of accidents and collisions 
Research is undertaken to collect evidence regarding identified risks 
Identified risks are compared and assessed against legislative requirements, codes of practice, relevant Australian standards and community expectations 
Clear priorities based on a ranking of safety factors are established 
Options relevant to reducing risk are identified 
Acquisition or resumption of land is identified 
All options are assessed on the basis of cost effectiveness, efficiency and practicality 
Preferred option to reduce risk is selected based on Council guidelines 
Council 'approval in principle' is obtained 
Statutory and other relevant authority approvals are obtained in required timeframes with minimal modification to the preferred option 
Opportunities are provided for community consultation to maximise acceptance of preferred option 
Clear, concise documentation is prepared that provides full preliminary cost details 
Options and recommendations, supported by clear rationale, are submitted to Council for endorsement 
Initial brief and regular, clear communication with design personnel is undertaken 
Implementation timeframes are advised to design personnel to ensure detail design is completed as required 
Design development is monitored to completion to ensure no errors or omissions are made 
A safety design audit is undertaken 
Final detailed cost estimates are accurately prepared 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

LGAPLEM608A - Identify and evaluate options to improve road safety
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:


Assessment Record Sheet

LGAPLEM608A - Identify and evaluate options to improve road safety

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: